Thursday, December 7, 2006

Baby Congratulation Phrases

Cass., Sec. lav., 7.11.2006, n. 2372 - Dismissal - No Posting disciplinary code - Legality

The dismissal for just cause or good reason is not affected by the failure to include of the facts alleged in the disciplinary code and its not displaying even when the charge against the employee is "in violation of rules of civil coexistence, which require mutual respect and that are rooted in social consciousness . This decision - in accordance with the prevailing orientation of the Supreme Court - basis in violation of those rules of civil society that counts "in the social consciousness which minimum ethical and not in collective agreements or determinations in entrepreneur" . Violation that, in this case, was reflected in the behavior disparaging against his employer.

Text of the judgment Cass., Sec. lav., 7.11.2006, n. 2372

Genital Warts And Waxing

Cass., Sec. A., 23.11.2006, No 24862 - Investigation of the possibility of inclusion of the disabled to work - Ordinary Jurisdiction

Disputes in the establishment of the possibility of job placement for the disabled, any promoted side, having reflected on the personal right to mandatory placement stability, belong to the jurisdiction of ordinary courts. So they decided the
Sec. A. the Supreme Court on the basis of the relief that the case falls in the cases for which the law allows a separate finding of facts from that taken by the party on the right are based (as is the case for the state of places, for urgent needs of evidence: art . 696 CCP, the truth of a document: art. cpc 220 on the audit of private writing and art. cpc 221 on the action for fraud).

Cass text of the sentence., Sec. A., 23.11.2006, No 24862

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Hcv More Condition_symptoms

Switching from fixed-term employment to permanent in Public Administration: the Court of Justice intervenes

Having stated that, having regard to the European Directive 1999/70/EC conjunction , "framework agreement" on fixed-term employment of 18/03/1999 - concluded by UNICE, the CEEP and the ETUC - as well as Legislative Decree 368/2001 implementing Directive above, you are establishing a relationship of indefinite duration in case of violation of the rules governing contracts in Tampa term contracts, the Court of Justice has clarified that it is indeed possible to derogate from this principle to employment contracts concluded with the PA, but on condition that the national legislation " includes another effective measure to prevent and, where appropriate, to punish the abuse of successive fixed-term contracts from an employer's public-sector .

text of the sentence on the proc. C-180/04