UGL Roma e Lazio
DOSSIER COMPENSI
I compensi degli amministratori esecutivi
delle aziende della holding Comune di Roma
Roma 21 luglio 2008
UGL LANCIA L’OPERAZIONE TRASPARENZA
L’8 luglio scorso, al Tavolo di concertazione del Comune di Roma con le parti sociali, l’UGL ha posto al Sindaco Alemanno la questione dei compensi degli amministratori delle società capitoline.
Secondo il Segretario Generale di Roma e Lazio della UGL, Luca Malcotti, “nel momento in cui il Sindaco rappresenta una situazione così drammatica delle finanze comunali e, soprattutto, mentre vi sono aziende partecipate dal Comune di Roma che ritardano a pagare gli salaries, is immoral that there are executives of those companies that earn abnormal figures. We ask that payment transaction transparency and also the story that has seen in recent times, many CEOs of companies, the appointment of the Mayor, to be hired as managers indefinitely so adding the two amounts. "
Fifteen days UGL distance reveals the real salaries of these managers and asked the Mayor Alemanno immediate action. All information comes from official accounts of the company. The reference standards
The 2007 Budget, in the name of rigor and transparency, has determined that the compensation of the managers of portfolio companies local authorities should be made public, they were compared to the compensation of the Mayor (for members of the Board), that any performance bonuses should be afforded in the case of holdings useful and objective and measurable results in quality of services rendered to the citizens . The Board Veltroni, promptly act in this way May 23, 2007 (No. 215 del. GC) by providing an extensive set of rules that, in essence, provide that the executive (President, CEO and Managing Director) may perceive allowances result only if the company has generated profits and only according to achievement of specific results: 40% of the premium growth of EBITDA (operating margin Gross), 50% to the improvement of indicators of good corporate governance, 10% improvement in an indicator of the quality provided. The resolution also states that the principle of anchoring the awards to the results is also true for managers of companies, which for an AD becomes employed, his contract will be temporary until the expiry of his term as AD.
Too bad it went like this: none of the companies in question (except Metro and Acea) produced profits, all companies have budget problems and are there for all the problems of management and efficiency of companies. Nevertheless, the fees have been paid on the results anyway.
The Directors
become leaders in recent years have also multiplied the executive directors of their respective companies who have obtained a contract manager, in some cases indefinitely. However it may make sense to frame a managing director as it is objectively less present than it is for the presidents, a position more political. Among those that have popped up a contract there are Executive Fulvio Vento and Joachim Gabbi (President and CEO of ATAC), Angela Marinetti (AD Atac Heritage), Federico Bortoli (AD Rome Metro), Stefano Bianchi and Robert Knight (President and CEO of Metro), Enzo Proietti (AD RXR), Albino Ruberti (AD Zetema) and, finally, Andrea Ferri at the beginning of 2008 has gone from managing director to CEO and executive procedure.
Fees
But how much they earn? The most striking example is undoubtedly that of Joachim Gabbi. Not only he became CEO of ATAC with a permanent contract, but felt the considerable sum of € 604,005 per annum plus € 16,594 for non-monetary benefits. Of this amount € 99,750 have been received in respect of payments result despite Atac certainly did not generate any profits. To give an idea Dr. Gabbi Members earn as 3, 2.5 as judges of the Constitutional Court, the apex 8 of the City Managers and more than one thirty drivers who drive the buses. Resolution 215 also stated that from then on it was no longer possible to recruit a permanent executive director. Cage, which was at first in this situation obviously has not felt the need to adapt.
are also significant compensation of the top of ACEA (the CEO Andrea Mangoni with € 670,000 a year and the Chairman Fabiano Fabiani with € 407,000 a year) but you can put aside because it is particularly large company , quoted and that pays dividends.
leave more puzzled by the remuneration of the Chairman of Atac Fulvio Vento (€ 350,755) to Angelo Marinetti (AD Heritage ATAC) with € 181,253, Raffaele Morese (President Trambus) with € 185,098, Stefano Bianchi (President Metro) with € 114,790, Vincenzo Puro (Pres RXR) with € 123,013 and Enzo Proietti (AD RxR) with 190,000 €. Then there is the case of Andrea Ferri (managing director of Rome in 2007 revenue), which received € 147,613 in February 2008 but is also the CEO and executive and is expected to reach € 250,000 per year.
also relevant payments of some AD quoted Federico Bortoli (Rome Metro) with € 479,913 and Roberto Cavalieri (AD Metro) with € 274,171. Here are John and Blaise
Hermanin Eramo (President and CEO of AMA) with their € 93,724 and € 82,008. Rounding out the standings President of the Portella Ivana Zetema with only 75,000 EUR el'AD Albino Ruberti the same company with 120,000 €. The total cost
The total amount that the Group has spent Hall in 2007 for executive directors, board of directors and board of auditors led to remarkable figure of € 6,036,764.04.
Obviously this is only the companies listed below, or those for which it was possible to find the approved budget. There are still many companies including Gemma spa, Insurance of Rome, Multiservice, Farmacap etc. The false advertising of fees
final consideration concerns the advertising of fees imposed by law and municipal decisions. On the site of the Capitol was published by Veltroni, the pattern of compensation. Unfortunately, the most obvious rewards are there and you tried to pretend that some executives and managers perceive much less than it was true. Just think of Wind and cage writes for the digit 0, unless an asterisk, which specifies that the two have a pay as officers of the company that obviously is not published. To publish the White Knights and compensation of 12,500 € and 25,000, subject to the usual asterisk. Bortoli also receives € 25,000 plus the asterisk, as they only affect 15,494 to 15,000 and Ruberti and Proietti.
The situation is different for some others to which it is specified that the published figure may increase to achieve objectives: so are Morese 93,724 € 185,000 instead of the real, resulting in pure € 82,008 instead of 123,000 to 300,000 instead of 407,000 Fabiani, Mangoni to 200,000 instead of 670,000 to 147,613 instead of 82,008 Ferri.
remains to understand what objectives these companies have reached when it is clear that achieved by their manager.
Requests UGL UGL
The calls to the Mayor of Rome a real transaction transparency, leading to revise the fees as abnormal, to really tie the compensation to business performance but also to check for cases where damage has been produced state representative through the provision of compensation is not payable.
UGL ROME AND LAZIO
the complete file:
www.storace.it
